Responsive Menu
Add more content here...

Auteur de la note

Pauline Geyer

Pauline Geyer is currently pursuing a dual master’s degree in International Security at Sciences Po Paris and International Relations at Peking University China. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in International Relations and Social Sciences from the University of Erfurt in Germany. Her interest in Asian politics was shaped by a gap year in Malaysia, studies at National Chengchi University in Taiwan, as well as internship and research roles at the Taiwan Center for Security Studies and Asia Centre. She is part of the Asia Sparks Research Coaching Program, working to broaden her understanding of Asia and refine her research expertise. 

 

François Issard

François Issard

François Issard has a Master in Geosciences and an Engineering degree from the French Petroleum Institute (ENSPM). Forty years of exposure to technical, operational and executive positions in the Oil and Gas industry in Africa, Europe, the United States and China (where he spent 18 years) have given him in-depth knowledge of World Energy Balance matters and now Energy Transition related issues, in particular as they pertain to Asia and EU regions, an expertise which he is now developing as an International Consultant and an Executive Member of Asia Centre. 

Autres analyses

[Asia Sparks] China-Taiwan Tensions as illustrated by “DiploMatrix” tracking methodology • Pauline Geyer & François Issard

Excerpt (13)

Pauline Geyer, sparker at Asia Centre, coached by François Issard, researcher at Asia Centre, published a paper analysing China-Taiwan tensions through DiploMatrix.

A detailed analysis of DiploMatrix’s bilateral tensions tracking tool illustrates steadily escalating tensions from 2015 to 2020 (the total tension index rises from 0.5 to 2.2-2.3) between China and Taiwan paralleling the ascension of the Democratic People’s Party (DPP) to power in Taipei. While the index is afterwards apparently stabilizing between 2 and 2.5 from 2020 to 2024 despite a notorious increase in Chinese military drills around the Island, the “Material tension” component of the index remains low as compared to other similar inter-state tension indexes in the region (China to Philippines for instance), up from 0.25 to 0.5 (a doubling over 10 years), which can be explained by a strategy shared by both parties to thoroughly avoid any direct confrontation in the air or at sea. The article provides an historical overview of noticeable events illustrating China-Taiwan bilateral relations with a focus on the period 2014-2024 which is the period when the DiploMatrix methodology has been applied in this review.

Read their whole analysis by clicking the PDF button.

asiacentre.eu