Our analyses
JA 22 – Risk Perception and Management in Japan – May 2011
In Japan but also all over the world, everyone keeps in mind the events of last March 11th, with a
CA – China debates its global strategy – April 2011
Has China become too bold in its dealings with the rest of the world? Some of the country’s own foreign
CA 32 – China’s Sea Power: Reaching Out to the Blue Waters – March 2011
The latest edition of China Analysis by the ECFR and Asia Centre deals with China’s maritime ambitions. It examines the
JA 21 – Regulating the Japanese Credit Market – Feb 2011
The two articles of analysis give a first appraisal of the reform law governing finance companies for credit, which came
JA 20 – Futenma and the Japanese-American Relations – Oct 2010
This issue, whose redaction is run by Guibourg Delamotte, proposes a detailed and critical analysis of the debate on the
JA 19 – Politics of the DPJ: Diplomacy and Agricultural Politics – June 2010
On June 2, Yukio Hatoyama declared his intention to resign from his post as a prime minister. Japan’s diplomacy under
CA 29 – Redbacks for Greenbacks: the Internationalisation of the Renminbi – Nov 2010
The interactions between the Chinese economy and the rest of the world are now huge, but expectations – and hopes
CA 28 – Geopolitics on Chinese Terms – Sept 2010
On Wednesday October 6th 2010 the EU holds summit meetings with both China and South Korea. Europe will only be
JA 18 – Reinforcing Political Leadership – March 2010
The Hatoyama government is undertaking major institutional reforms in order to increase the influence of politicians in the decision- making
CA 27 – Climate Policies after Copenhagen – June 2010
In the latest edition of China Analysis, published by the ECFR and Asia Centre, we look at how Beijing views
JA 17 – The Victory of the Minshuto – Dec. 2009
The Democratic Party (Minshutô) won the general election on August 30th, when it gained 191 seats. With 308 seats, it
CA 25 – China Shapes its Post-Crisis Agenda – Jan 2010
In this issue of China Analysis, the authors argue that Beijing is taking a short term view in the debate